INSERT INTO sites(host) VALUES('') 1045: Access denied for user 'www-data'@'localhost' (using password: NO) Estimated Worth $66,647 - MYIP.NET Website Information
Welcome to!
 Set MYIP as homepage      


Web Page Information

Meta Description:
Meta Keywords:
sponsored links:
sponsored links:

Traffic and Estimation


Website Ranks

Alexa Rank:
Google Page Rank:
Sogou Rank:
Baidu Cache:

Search Engine Indexed

Search EngineIndexedLinks

Server Data

Web Server:
IP address:    

Registry information

ICANN Registrar:
Name Server:
Whois Server:

Alexa Rank and trends

Traffic: Today One Week Avg. Three Mon. Avg.
Unique IP:

More ranks in the world

Users from these countries/regions

Where people go on this site

Alexa Charts

Alexa Reach and Rank

Whois data

Who is at

Welcome to the Network Solutions(R) Registrar WHOIS Server.

The IP address from which you have visited the Network Solutions Registrar WHOIS

database is contained within a list of IP addresses that may have failed

to abide by Network Solutions' WHOIS policy. Failure to abide by this policy can

adversely impact our systems and servers, preventing the processing of

other WHOIS requests.

To see the Network Solutions WHOIS Policy, click on or copy and paste the following

URL into your browser:

If you feel that you have received this message in error, please email us using the online

form at with the following information:

Whois Query:

YOUR IP address is

Date and Time of Query: Thu Jul 07 22:29:13 EDT 2016

Reason Code: IE

Front Page Thumbnail

sponsored links:

Front Page Loading Time

Keyword Hits (Biger,better)

Other TLDs of fullcirc

TLDs Created Expires Registered

Similar Websites


Search Engine Spider Emulation

Title:Full Circle Associates: Nancy White
Description:Communications, learning, and connected solutions for a changing world.
Keywords:communications,planning,connected solutions,social strategy,social media, learning, communities of practice, collaboration, facilitation, communities, networks, non profits, NGOs
 Full Circle Associates: Nancy White HomeAbout Full CircleContactResourcesWikiFull CircusFull Circle Associatesconnections for a changing world, online and offline #8230; May 27 2014 #8220;Things We Need in Order to Do Our Jobs and Make the World Better Dammit鈥 (TWNODOJMWBD) Published by Nancy White under community,non profits/ngos I strongly recommend all of you who (still!) read this blog and who work in nonprofits, care about the role of service in our communities, have been served or have served a non profit, (etc. etc. etc.) to read Vu Le #8217;s post, General operating funds, admin expenses, and why we nonprofits are our own worst enemies . So that means ALL of you who are readers from the US. And this applies to NGOs as well, so that probably means ALL of you.I have worked for non profits as staff, consultant and/or volunteer most of my adult life and all I can say to Vu is AMEN!聽The farce of fundraising language used to drive me crazy as a non profit staffer. The way we fund and account for money in US non profits is insane, and take that in the context of the proliferation of non profits, the whole thing starts sinking. And if you think the US is crazy, look into large NGOs and UN agencies. Mama mia!And at whose expense is this farce? Those we seek to serve. So get our your checkbook, bitcoin, credit card or even cash. Walk over to your favorite non profit and give them money with no strings.Accountability you say? Here is the magic sauce. After you fork over your money, fork over your time. Pay attention to what #8217;s happening around you. Then you become part of the real accountability process. Is something good happening that the organization with and for聽its constituency? Is there learning happening through both successes and failures? Are more people talking about and aware of the organization and its mission, bringing in more support?Vu also outlined 7 ways non profit staff can help shift towards more honest funding and accountability. I #8217;m putting in some snippets here:Stop saying 鈥100% (or 98%, or 95% or whatever) of your donations go into programming.鈥澛 #8230;The next time you attend a fundraising event that says 鈥100% of your donations鈥,鈥 forward them this blog post. Or, raise your paddle and then loudly proclaim, 鈥淚 want my donations to support聽administrative expenses!鈥漃ublicly recognize funders who support general operating funds.聽 #8230;These are our strongest allies, like聽Unmi Song聽of the Lloyd A. Fry Foundation or聽Paul Shoemaker聽of Social Venture Partners.聽Stop using the term 鈥渙verhead鈥 or 鈥渋ndirect.鈥澛燱e need to change these crappy words and phrases with all the negative connotations. #8230;From now on, in all our annual reports and in general, let鈥檚 call it 鈥渃ritical infrastructure鈥 or 鈥渃ore support鈥 or 鈥淭hings We Need in Order to Do Our Jobs and Make the World Better Dammit鈥 (TWNODOJMWBD)Stop artificially deflating numbers and apologizing for percentage spent on critical infrastructure #8230;.鈥淭here is no standardized way to calculate admin expenses, so the comparison is meaningless. Plus, we strongly believe that investing in critical infrastructure like staff development leads to much better outcomes.鈥漇top seeking the approval of聽charity watchdog organizations like Charity Navigator, Charity Watch, and Better Business Bureau/Wise Giving Alliance.聽 #8230;until they figure out a way to accurately measure organizations鈥 effectiveness, their rankings are misleading and distracting.Write in a line-item for reserve funds in your organization鈥檚 operating budget. #8230;聽Build in a line for reserves, and if anyone whines about it, explain why it鈥檚 important and ask them to support it or else to stop asking about聽sustainability.Push back, and be willing to lose a funder.聽 #8230;Sometimes, telling the truth or refusing to break down our expenses and forcing people to focus on outcomes, or refusing to accept funds to do things that would ultimately cost us more than it brings in revenues, may cost us a funder or donor, but this short-term sacrifice may be far better for our organization and for our sector in the long run.I #8217;ve forked over my money. Now I have to hold ME accountable and return to forking over time.A confession: A few years ago I did some work for Social Venture Partners聽here in Seattle. I was deeply impressed with how they operated at every level and their strong intentions to see and work at a systems level. I almost became an investor, but personally felt outside of the culture of the other investors so I shied away. But as I read Vu #8217;s comments about the value and importance of how SVP invests in its communities with both money and time, I am reminded how important these approaches are. Whether I join an SVP, or I find a kindred approach, I reconfirm my intention that it is not just what we do to support our communities, but how we do. And funding all facets of the work is critical.Share and amplify:Like this:Like Loading... Comments Off May 14 2014 Puddle Jumping @ the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education Conference Published by Nancy White under collaboration,complexity Tags: #CNIE2014, confluences, Pattern_LanguageWell, it is on the schedule for tomorrow morning, so I had better be ready for my keynote at the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education Conference. This is a placeholder blog where I #8217;ll post the talk artifacts (song lyrics, visuals, and whatever else we create) and resources. The resources below are placeholder for now, so stand by until tomorrow night! I #8217;m talking without slides, with uke and probably (as usual) trying to pack too much in. But hey, if you aren #8217;t learning, why do a keynote, right? Wish me luckResourcesLiberating Structures http:/www.liberatingstructures.comDigital Habitats: stewarding technology for communities framework Social Labs Revolution deMoor #8217;s site on pattern language for collaboration (ask him about his Blackboard study)聽 process pattern language http://www.groupworksdeck.orgSource of the Curtis Ogden quote:聽 of the Wenger-Trayner quote聽 Estuaries of Alice MacGillivray聽 and Interesting Stuff amp;rep=rep1 amp;type=pdfShare and amplify:Like this:Like Loading... 6 responses so far Mar 05 2014 Ponderings on Network #038; Community Governance Part 1 Published by Nancy White under communities of practice,international development,networks,non profits/ngos Tags: governanceWarning: LONG thinking-out-loud post!聽And note, the best stuff is in the comments!For the last month or so there have been some very interesting conversations on the KM4Dev email discussion. One of them has been a reflection on the governance of KM4Dev, particularly the role of the current Core Group and the overall business model. KM4Dev has been around for over 10 years and grown to be a vibrant and respected community. It certainly is one of my very central communities of practice and I love and fret over it a lot. I was on the Core group from its inception until about 18 months ago when I stepped out, partly from burnout, partly from frustration, but keenly aware that my #8220;just do it #8221; attitude had longer term ramifications of people expecting me and the other #8220;do-ers #8221; to, well, just get it done. That is dis-empowering. (And I can be, um, a little dominating? ) Now, back to the question of governance.This begs the question, what kind of animal IS KM4Dev? A community of practice (CoP)? A loose, affiliated network of people interested in KM in development? A service? How should this inform our choices? Are there sufficient distinctions in the governance and supporting infrastructure of a larger network, versus a more bounded community? Or is it more dependent on the nature of that community or network?As I read the messages, there were those who advocated a strong group for governance, for a paid secretariat staff. For formality. Others suggested developing multiple local offshoots and centralize the support functions in those volunteer hubs. From ideas for spin offs that embrace diverse business models, pleas for funding, to a very open, #8220;let it be #8221; model, all struck me as models that reflected each person #8217;s world view. 聽Some 聽fundamentally urged the group to become more of an advocate for KM in development as a community, while others kept a more CoP-traditional perspective of the group as a place for its own learning. Do academics prefer more formality? What causes people to think paid positions are more generative for the community than volunteering? Are there ramifications beyond reliability? SOOOO many things to consider.I then sent the following message to the group (this is just part of the message. It was a rambly, early morning thing!):Here is my perception (NOT FACT) Those of us who prefer structure and some degree of formality discussed more about governance and secretariat (and I suppose, have a clearer idea about that differentiation. It is not a language used outside of development much here in the US!) Those of us who prefer informality (or perhaps, just fleeing too much structure!) emphasize the more emergent and adhoc options. Those who are taking a strong community lens focus on the community aspects of volunteerism and self organization. Those with a KM lens, (which in fact, have not stood out in my memory of reading these threads #8212; INTERESTING) advocate for structures which focus on KM and finally, some have advocated structure that in fact advocates for international development.How do we find your way forward with all these options? Furthermore, how do you discern options where people will #8220;walk their talk #8221; and pick up leadership. It is all nice and good to say #8220;YOU should do this or that. #8221; But in the end, if no one in the community is willing to step up to the tasks, all is probably lost. If no one cares enough to value and use what is provided #8211; paid or not, what is it worth?Consider this: 聽if you look at the number of people posting in the thread (less than 20?) compared to the list of members on the email list and/or our NING site (2500+), how do you reconcile the individual advocacy for a particular path forward with the huge, silent, larger whole? To whom does this #8220;governance #8221; thing matter? Is it important to those who simply see KM4Dev as an email list they can dip into when they need it #8211; a sort of service? To those who avidly read, but rarely or never post for a host of reasons? To those of us who perhaps love KM4dev too much? So I started doodling. 聽Is it useful to examine our governance and structure questions from a variety of lenses, and then find out if there is a sweet spot between them? From the conversation I discerned three possible lenses or perspectives including: 聽Community, KM (in development) and Advocacy for KM in Development.聽Here is what I sketched on my notebook.For example, philosophically I absolute love the idea that KM4Dev should be more altruistic and more actively serve development. The realist in me says this is a structural mismatch, that indeed, by focusing on community and KM, we become stronger agents of that wider change through other, more formalized structures (of our orgs, etc) and we become INFLUENCERS as a network.聽聽But that does not exclude forays into advocacy. The lenses do not imply #8220;either/or #8221; but simply help us explore from a variety of perspectives. Here is a聽very imperfect聽first try and looking across the three example lenses : 聽If I look across the three, there is less difference between the community lens and the domain lens, while the advocacy lens presents unique benefits and needs. As noted above, it looks to be a far stretch for KM4Dev to pull that off. That said, KM4Dev might be an amazing incubator for a more focused group working on the advocacy.So the next level of resource implications are about the degree of importance KM4Dev activities and artifacts have to be polished to the level of acceptance by development organizations and practitioners outside of the community. In other words, legitimacy beyond the community. This seems to require more infrastructure and thus more refined business models (funding) and processes.So the question is, what does the community want and what can it pull off. And I #8217;d personally add, how does it differentiate itself from yet another organization?Help me improve my thinking.P.S. If you look back up to the first image, you will see some scribbling on the lower right of the notebook sketch. I #8217;ll post about that in the next blog post. 聽Stay tuned for Part 2 of Nancy #8217;s Ramblings #8230;.Share and amplify:Like this:Like Loading... 30 responses so far Mar 05 2014 Clay Shirky and #8220;the collaborative penumbra #8221; Published by Nancy White under collaboration,international development,knowledge sharing Some words just catch us.I was scanning this transcript of an interview with Clay Shirky (thank you Twitter network) and came across this quote:So the collaborative penumbra around 3-D printing is a place where you don鈥檛 have to have someone who can do everything鈥攆rom having the idea to making the mesh to printing it. You can start having division of labor. So you #8217;ve got all of these small groups that are just working together like studios and still able to play on a world stage.via The disruptive power of collaboration: An interview with Clay Shirky | McKinsey amp; Company.I just loved the term, #8220;collaborative penumbra. #8221;I continue to rabbit away at what has become my hobby research, how international development organizations plan for, pick, provision, monitor and evaluate their online collaboration platforms. What comes up again and again is that organizations have very limited ideas about the meaning and possibilities of collaboration. There is still this idea that it is composed of two things: document sharing and project management. And document sharing covers the territory of #8220;knowledge sharing. #8221; Sigh. I keep looking for useful anecdotes to demonstrate the rainbow of possibilities. But each example then points to the fact that this is a fundamental shift in the way work is done. That scares people. They like their #8220;habitus #8221; as Zaid Hassan talks about in his book, #8220;The Social Labs Revolution. #8221;Here is another quote from the interview (emphasis mine): #8220;And all the way at the other end of the spectrum, you鈥檝e got these collaborative environments where almost no one has to coordinate with anybody else. When I upload something to Thingiverse, or I make an edit on Wikipedia, it鈥檚 not like I need anybody else鈥檚 help or permission. So the collaborative range is expanding. The tight groups have more resources, and the loose groups can be much more loosely coordinated and operate at a much larger scale. And I think the people who think about collaboration want to know what鈥檚 happening to it, and the answer is everything. #8221;Go read the rest. There are more gems there #8230; go to the source!Share and amplify:Like this:Like Loading... 3 responses so far Mar 04 2014 Faciliplay: Play as an Online Facilitation Technique Published by Nancy White under facilitation,online facilitation,online interaction Tags: fun, playNote:聽Faciliplay: Play as an Online Facilitation Technique聽was a post I wrote way back in the early life of this blog, before I moved to聽WordPress. A lot of those posts feel lost, so I #8217;m聽picking a few and reposting them. Some, like this one on play, need updating or at least contextualizing. This was written in the day when online interaction was centered on discussion forums, so the advice is framed in that context. It is almost quaint. 聽Today we can imagine and improvise a much broader聽repertoire聽of faciliplay. If you have any great examples,聽please add them in the comments.Faciliplay: Play as an Online Facilitation Technique (in discussion forums)by聽choconancyFirst of all, the members of the Fall 1999聽Knowledge Ecology University (now defunct)聽Online Facilitation Course inspired me write this. Their wonderful expressions in #8220;Just Three Words #8221; confirmed what I #8217;ve felt for a while that play can be a liberating, powerful tool for groups and individuals.The online manifestations for play are varied. Like offline humor, we need to take care that our choices respect or bridge personal and cultural differences. Segmentation of #8220;playful #8221; spaces and activities help maintain topical and project work in the #8220;serious #8221; spaces. The terms #8220;playful #8221; and #8220;serious #8221; don #8217;t need to be so separate, so inviolate. They can be merged with some attention to group dynamics. But that #8217;s for another time.What I #8217;d like to share here are some resources on incorporating play into your facilitation repertoire for online conference/discussion spaces; a #8220;bag of toys, #8221; if you will, which you can spread out on the #8220;virtual table. #8221; These are primarily for use in asynchronous bulletin boards or discussion forums but if you use your imagination, I bet you can find many other ways to use them.As background on the use of play in facilitation, you may wish to check out Bernie DeKoven #8217;s #8220;Deep Fun #8221; site at聽 Bernie is the author of聽The Well-Played Game. Bernie has created a playground to share ideas on play for facilitators, therapists and healers. 聽Check it out. Add your ideas.聽Let #8217;s play!Playful TopicsThere is a rich tradition in online play topics from social communities across the net. Many of them became #8220;institutions #8221; at such places as the聽,聽聽and other communities. Here are some examples:Just One Word/Just Three Words:聽as the topic explains, each post has a word limitation. This creates a quick interaction opportunity, allows each poster to #8220;riff #8221; of the previous and can spawn some interesting creative runs. Good for freeing up thinking while brainstorming or using other divergent, creative facilitation strategies. Safe place for anyone to post #8230; you don #8217;t have to create a great literary piece to post! If you want to ratchet it up a notch, try approaches like #8220;rhyme two lines: #8221;It #8217;s better to jump in and try it yourself Than let a forum linger, closed, on the shelf #8230;The Never-Ending Story/Limericks, and other Continuation Topics: Group creation of a story, poem or limerick draws people back because they want to see how the next person has built on their contribution. This also demonstrates how responding to others and reciprocity can help build the group. Plus, it can be a creative kick in the pants. In watching these topic grow, a facilitator can also get an idea of what type of team player each participant might be. There will be those who will adhere to the story line, and those who always veer. Both are important parts of a group. But it #8217;s nice to know who is who, eh?Community History Topics: Online architect聽Amy Jo Kim聽is a strong proponent of a community #8220;backstory #8221; or history. By providing space for the group to record and comment on the history, to actually create it, you can provide ownership and a place to be #8220;seen #8221; by the community through specific additions to the record.Bars/Grills/Coffeeshops: Hanging out, shooting the breeze, playing around with simulacrums of food and drink is very engaging for a portion of your group. These places are safe spots to let us slowly reveal more about ourselves, both in and out of our #8220;task #8221; or #8220;work/business #8221; concepts. They provide some metaphorical #8220;body language. #8221;聽What Are You Reading/Eating/Thinking: Easy places to drop information, have fun without a high intellectual or time overhead. And get great tips on new books, movies or chocolate recipies. Good for longer term communities and groups. These topics don #8217;t build the critical mass in shorter, time-delimited settings unless, of course, it is a topic about chocolate (only kidding #8230;)聽Confess and Be Absolved: Sometimes you just need to get it off your chest. Master storyteller Paul Beleserene of Vancouver BC started this topic in the old Electric Minds. It was a people magnet. It could be funny, poignant, it could be a safe way to apologize to a fellow community member. And Paul, as host, absolved every single person and sent him or her on their way feeling just a little bit better about themselves. I confess I still love this topic.Playful Applications of Interaction SpacesBulletin Boards/Forums/Discussions:聽Consider creating a segment of your online space for play to ensure it doesn #8217;t jeopardize your #8220;serious #8221; topics. Not everyone likes to goof around. Make sure your names reflect the purpose of those spaces.Chat:聽Provide open chat room areas for people to spontaneously chat and get to know, talk about non-project issues or just goof around. Schedule chat times for the group as a coffee klatch or cocktail party as a #8220;get to know #8221; function.Instant Messengers:聽Quick compliments, silly one liners or a quick emoticon wink can create deeper context for your more serious, recorded activities in a conference. Find a place to share IM contacts.Playful Communications ToolsEmoticons:聽There are tons of emoticons that serve as text #8220;body language. #8221; Some disdain them, but it is helpful to include a little if you are using irony or sarcasm in the space where tone and facial expression are absent. Here are a few along with some acronyms commonly used online: or are smiley faces composed of a colon and a right parenthesis mark or or or ;- gt; is a more tongue in cheek smile, wink, employing a semi-colon :O = surprised face (and there are聽hundreds聽of variations) lt;g gt; = grinD or = big grin:/ or :-/ = chagrin, disappointment, etc. or = frownbtw = by the wayimo = in my opinion (or imho = in my聽humble聽opinion)rotfl = rolling on the floor laughinglol = laughing out loudFor more emoticons, see聽Emoticons: Online Body LanguageImages and Fonts:聽Sometimes adding a little聽color聽or images to a communication can help enhance a message. Here is one of my favorite animated gifs that a member of one of my online communities made in reference to people getting a wee bit too touchy about issues and feeling attacked:聽聽Image courtesy of Steve Ruano, 漏1999 (alas, gif is gone!)Snarfs and Post-a-thons:聽These are really down-and-dirty techniques that are not for just any online interaction space, but for die-hard online addicts. Most often found in purely social communities, they can inspire quite intense participation and engagement. Now, definitions! A snarf聽is a post with a particularly toothsome number. Century snarfs (100, 200, 300) are pretty common in big, public communities. Big K #8217;s (1,000 #8217;s) are rarer and more prized. Then there are the other odd number combinations which include repeat numbers (555, or the infamous Karen Valentine snarf #8212; 222), numbers with other significance (777, 69) or sometimes people like to snarf numbers that have personal significance like birthdays (51558) or anniversaries. It is totally silly. It can catch like wildfire. It can also destroy the experience for those who do not like snarfing. Consider yourself warned.Post-A-Thons聽are group efforts to drive up the number of posts in a topic. Again, this is a social community thing. Don #8217;t ask me. I #8217;ve done it. I confess. I really burned out a wrist one weekend trying to get 7,000 posts in one topic as a form of social protest to site management #8217; capricious decisions at a community that will go unnamed. But you would be amazed how it builds a group over a short period of time. Kind of like a strong, addictive drug. Again, you #8217;ve been warned #8230;. The best way to understand these playful applications is to visit some online communities and join in. (ALAS, so many of these are gone!)聽Check out聽, (especially the Playground conference),聽(click on Table Talk) or聽http://www.utne.com聽. And have fun!Image of purple lady from聽Jeffrey Zeldman PresentsShare and amplify:Like this:Like Loading... Comments OffNext #187;New to Full Circle?Welcome! This is both my weblog and my business site. If you are looking for information about me or my company, click on the "About Full Circle"at the top of the site.Buy Digital HabitatsSearch Search for: SubscriptionsSubscribe in a readerGet the dang Full Circle posts via email! Subscribe here! Enter your email address:Delivered by FeedBurnerGender AvengersSite MapAbout Full CircleAbout Nancy WhiteNancy VideosArticles #038; PublicationsFacilitation, Community #038; Network Building ServicesOnline Clients and Case StudiesSpeaking, Presenting and Workshop ExperienceTrainings and WorkshopsGraphic Facilitation WorkshopsOnline Facilitation WorkshopWorkshop TestimonialsVisual and Graphic WorkMichael Erickson #8217;s Graphic Icon LibraryNancy on Other SitesPrivacy and CopyrightContactResourcesFacilitation ResourcesDesigning and Facilitating Online EventsSynchronous Scheduling Trips in Larger Distributed GroupsTelephone Conference Call TipsGlossary of Online InteractionOnline Community ToolkitCase Study: the IBM/Electric Minds Kasparov v. Deep Blue Chess Match CommunityCase: Creating Connections Online #8211; the CGIAR Gender and Diversity 2001 Online EventCommunity and Social Media Guidelines and PoliciesCommunity Member ArchetypesCommunity Member RolesFaciliplay:Play as an Online Facilitation TechniqueOnline Community Purpose ChecklistOnline Facilitation Workshop CurriculumBookshelfWikiFull CircusCategories Select CategoryBlogroll (2)change (12)chocolate (10)collaboration (73)communication (19)communities of practice (101)community (103)community indicators (84)complexity (7)creative destruction (2)creativity (24)culture of love (51)engagement (27)evaluation (11)events (174)facilitation (137)Full Circ-Us (5)graphic facilitation (54)harvesting (26)identity (17)improvisation (6)international development (39)knowledge sharing (83)language (12)learning (82)love (11)Monday videos (73)networks (69)non profits/ngos (29)online interaction (123) online facilitation (58) UsThem (4)podcasts (17)presentations (2)reflection (37)social media (128)sustainability (1)systems (3)technology stewardship (114) Digital Habitats (24)tools (7)triangulation (3)turning 50 (5)Uncategorized (70)visual thinking (91) Recent CommentsConfluences and divergences at CNIE2014 | Xploring Education on Puddle Jumping @ the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education ConferenceFacilitation and collective action back on the menu #8230; big time! | Agile KM for me #8230; and you? on About Nancy WhiteNancy White on Puddle Jumping @ the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education ConferenceBen Roberts on Puddle Jumping @ the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education ConferenceCNIE Session: #8220;Eat the Data: Reclaiming Innovation #8221; with Dr. Jones | Abject on Puddle Jumping @ the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education ConferenceArchives Select Month May 2014 (2) March 2014 (4) February 2014 (5) January 2014 (4) December 2013 (1) November 2013 (2) October 2013 (2) September 2013 (2) July 2013 (7) June 2013 (4) May 2013 (4) April 2013 (6) March 2013 (7) February 2013 (7) January 2013 (10) December 2012 (2) November 2012 (3) October 2012 (10) September 2012 (8) August 2012 (3) July 2012 (2) June 2012 (4) May 2012 (8) April 2012 (6) March 2012 (3) February 2012 (6) January 2012 (8) December 2011 (7) November 2011 (7) October 2011 (7) September 2011 (7) August 2011 (9) July 2011 (4) June 2011 (7) May 2011 (11) April 2011 (9) March 2011 (6) February 2011 (2) January 2011 (6) December 2010 (2) November 2010 (5) October 2010 (2) September 2010 (1) August 2010 (1) July 2010 (1) June 2010 (3) May 2010 (4) April 2010 (8) March 2010 (14) February 2010 (10) January 2010 (11) December 2009 (3) November 2009 (16) October 2009 (9) September 2009 (13) August 2009 (13) July 2009 (12) June 2009 (6) May 2009 (13) April 2009 (23) March 2009 (29) February 2009 (22) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (4) November 2008 (9) October 2008 (3) September 2008 (20) August 2008 (10) July 2008 (33) June 2008 (2) May 2008 (6) April 2008 (28) March 2008 (29) February 2008 (27) January 2008 (39) December 2007 (24) November 2007 (8) May 2007 (1) January 2007 (1) November 2005 (1) July 2005 (1) May 2005 (1) Older ArchivesOlder Blog ArchivesCommunities amp; Network Connections People 2009 Social Community 2010 More gt; gt; Hosted by Midas Green Tech This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.Delicious Clustrmaps Site Admin | Full Circle Phone: 206-517-4754 | nancyw at fullcirc dot com | WordPress Theme
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.
Send to Email Address
Your Name
Your Email Address
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this:

Updated Time

Friend links: ProxyFire    More...
Site Map 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750
TOS | Contact us
© 2009 Dev by MYIP Elapsed:48.150ms