EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center
EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center
Home
About EPIC
Policy Issues
Bookstore
Press
Events
Support EPIC
Focusing public attention on emerging privacy and civil liberties issues
Latest News - October 10, 2010
Privacy Groups Object to Google's "Simplified" Privacy Policy
EPIC and 14 other privacy and consumer protection groups sent a letter to Google CEO Eric Schmidt about Google's revised privacy policy. Under this new policy, twelve specific Google privacy policies will be replaced by a single policy that will enable greater data sharing within the corporation. EPIC previously raised similar concerns about Google Buzz in a complaint to the Federal Trade Commission. In the complaint, EPIC argued that Google's Gmail-specific privacy policy was more protective of users than their general privacy policy. For more information, see EPIC: In re Google Buzz.
Posted on October 6, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in NASA Privacy Case
On October 5, 2010 the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that will determine whether public contract employees have a right to limit the government's collection of their personal information. The case, NASA v. Nelson, was brought by a NASA scientist who argued that the Constitution grants a right to privacy from invasive government background checks. NASA claims that the Privacy Act provides sufficient legal protections. EPIC authored a "friend of the court" brief in the case, cosigned by 27 technical experts and legal scholars. EPIC's brief highlights exceptions in the Privacy Act, claimed by the federal agency, that place the scientists' personal information at risk. For more information, see EPIC: NASA v. Nelson and EPIC: Workplace Privacy.
Posted on October 4, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
EPIC Supports Proposed Reforms for Surveillance Court, Urges Additional Measures
EPIC has submitted comments on the proposed rules for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. In comparison to the previous rules, promulgated in 2006, EPIC said that the new rules would strengthen judicial independence, improve congressional oversight, and promote, to some extent, greater transparency of the court that oversees the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. EPIC also urged the Court to establish a web presence with information about the Court's activities and to publish detailed annual reports. EPIC said these measures would promote accountability and enhance public understanding of the Court and its functions. For more information, see EPIC: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and EPIC: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Posted on October 4, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
EPIC Seeks Details on New Government Crypto Regulations
EPIC has sent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the National Security Agency for information about a proposal to expand Internet surveillance and deploy weakened security standards. The proposal would require Internet companies to develop network services to enable government access to private communications, including those on peer-to-peer networks. In 1996, the National Resource Council concluded that such technical standards make network communications more vulnerable to cyber attack. For more information, see EPIC: Cryptography Policy.
Posted on September 29, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Federal Appeals Court Protects Innocent Targets of Government Surveillance
A federal appeals court in New York overruled a lower court order that would have disclosed thousands of wiretapped conversations, to the Security and Exchange Commission. The appeals court called the disclosure a "clear and indisputable" abuse of discretion. In SEC v. Galleon, the SEC sought 18,150 private conversations, obtained by the FBI, before any determination of whether the interceptions were relevant or lawful.The court issued the order which was then appealed. EPIC filed an amicus brief and urged the appellate court to protect "the privacy rights of hundreds of individuals" who had no involvement in the case. The court agreed and found that "ordering discovery of the wiretap materials before any determination of the legality of the surveillance involved exceeded the district court #8217;s discretion." For more information, see EPIC: SEC v. Galleon and EPIC: Wiretapping.
Posted on September 29, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Supreme Court Will Decide If Corporations Have Personal Privacy Rights
The Supreme Court has agreed to review AT T v. FCC, a case in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals held that corporations have personal privacy rights. In that case, AT T prevented the public disclosure of records held by a government agency, arguing that the corporation's privacy rights would be violated. The case hinges on the interpretation of the "personal privacy" exemption in the Freedom of Information Act. EPIC, which both advocates for privacy and supports open government, is likely to file an amicus brief. For more information, see EPIC: FCC v. AT T and EPIC: Open Government.
Posted on September 29, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
US Government Seeks to Monitor All Money Transfers
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is proposing new regulations that would require banks to report all international electronic money transfers. The regulation would significantly expand the transfer of bank record information to the US Treasury Department and law enforcement agencies. The proposed regulations are available online and open for public comment. For more information, see EPIC: International Privacy Standards.
Posted on September 28, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Five Billion Have Right to Information
Human rights organization Article 19 reported that over 90 countries have adopted laws, constitutional amendments or regulations protecting the right to freedom of information. Additionally, over 50 countries are considering proposals to adopt laws that will protect citizens #8217; right to know. Article 19 commends the World Bank for its transparency policy, the United Nation #8217;s Environmental Programme for enhanced access to environmental information, and the efforts of the U.S. and UK governments to launch open data sites. See EPIC - Open Government.
Posted on September 28, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
National Academies Releases New Report on Biometrics
The National Academy of Sciences has released a report entitled "Biometric Recognition: Challenges and Opportunities." The report concluded that biometric recognition technologies are inherently probabilistic and inherently fallible. Sources of uncertainty in biometric systems include variation within persons, sensors, feature extraction and matching algorithms, and data integrity. The report recommends a more comprehensive systems level approach to the contexts, design, and use of biometric technologies as well as peer-reviewed testing and evaluation of the technologies. EPIC has urged the Department of Defense to establish privacy safeguards for the biometric database the US established of Iraqis. See EPIC - Biometric Identifiers and EPIC - Iraqi Biometric Identification System.
Posted on September 28, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Senator Collins Responds to EPIC's Request for Hearings on Airport Body Scanners
Senator Susan Collins has sent a letter to EPIC Director Marc Rotenberg and consumer advocate Ralph Nader regarding airport body scanners. Senator Collins stated in the letter "I agree wholeheartedly that TSA must ensure that this new security technology is proven effective and comes with sufficient protections to the health and privacy of all persons." Mr. Rotenberg and Mr. Nader had sent Senator Collins a request for a public hearing about the security agency's body scanner program. The US Senate has not yet scheduled such a hearing, but leaders in the European Parliament will examine the issue of body scanners on October 6. EPIC will be participating in that hearing. For more information, see EPIC v. DHS (Suspension of Body Scanner Program) and EPIC - Airport Body Scanners.
Posted on September 28, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Senate Holds Hearing on Data Security and Breach Notification Bill
The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on S. 3742, The Data Security and Breach Notification Act of 2010. This bill requires security policies for consumer information, regulates the information broker industry, and establishes a national breach notification law. EPIC director Marc Rotenberg testified on a similar bill in the House recommending support but also urging lawmakers to strengthen the proposed law by adopting a broader definition of "personally identifiable information" and permitting stronger state laws to remain. The Senate thus far has not addressed these concerns. For more information, see EPIC: Identity Theft.
Posted on September 24, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
DHS Privacy Office Releases 2010 Annual Report
The Department of Homeland Security has released the Privacy Office 2010 Annual Report. The Agency's Chief Privacy Officer must prepare an annual report to Congress that details activities of the Department that affect privacy, including complaints of privacy violations, and DHS compliance with the Privacy Act of 1974. This year #8217;s report details the establishment of privacy officers within each component of the Agency. The report also provides updates on Fusion Centers, Cybersecurity, and Cloud Computing activities of the agency. For more information, see EPIC: DHS Privacy Office.
Posted on September 24, 2010 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Top News Archive
Search epic.org
Donate to EPIC
p
Hot Policy Issues
Body Scanners
Cloud Computing
Childrens' Online Privacy
DHS Privacy Office
Facebook
Facebook Places
Fusion Centers
Google Books Settlement
Google Street View
Iraqi Biometric ID System
Lisbon Treaty and Privacy
Medical Record Privacy
National ID
Open Government
Privacy Convention
Re-identification
Search Engine Privacy
Smart Grid
Social Networking Privacy
Connect with EPIC
EPIC on Facebook
EPIC on Twitter
EPIC RSS Feed
EPIC Publications
Privacy amp; Human Rights
More EPIC Publications...
EPIC Bookstore Feature
Because It Is Wrong: Torture, Privacy and Presidential Power in the Age of Terrora
More EPIC Publications...
Resources
EPIC Alert [subscribe]
EPIC Bookstore
EPIC Events
EPIC Press Releases
EPIC Privacy Tools
EPIC Reports
Bill-Track
Former Secrets (FOIA)
Privacy Resources
About EPIC
About EPIC
Support EPIC
Advisory Board
Board and Staff
Jobs/IPIOP Clerkships
Litigation Docket
Privacy Policy
Affiliated Sites
EPIC Brochure (pdf)
____________________
Coalitions
Global Internet Liberty Campaign
In Defense of Freedom
Internet Free Expression Alliance
National Comm. for Voting Integrity
On the Identity Trail
Privacy Coalition
Privacy International
The Privacy Site
The Public Voice
Security Framework Project
Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue
FOIA Documents
EPIC FOIA Notes
EPIC FOIA Note #16: FTC Discloses Conflict of Interest Analysis Involving Jones Day Law Firm
FOIA Notes
EPIC Former Secrets
Spotlight on Surveillance
Proposed "Enhanced" Licenses are Costly to Security and Privacy
Spotlight on Surveillance Archive
Privacy Campaign
____________________
Internet Privacy Infographic
Privacy Report Card
p
View the EPIC Report Card here.
View the press release here.
Privacy Google Books
Google Books Settlement Privacy
Google Books Policy
Google Books Litigation
Take Action
EPIC has filed a lawsuit to suspend the deployment of body scanners at US airports, pending an independent review.
Details on EPIC v. DHS
-Stop Body Scanners!
-EPIC's Spotlight on Surveillance
-Join the Facebook Group
-Body Scanner FAQ
EPIC Body Scanner Incident Report
Click here to report body scanner incidents you have encountered.
Privacy Video
Fox News: 'Peep Show Database of American Travelers'
____________________
C-SPAN: Improving Medical Privacy
Previous Video Archive...
Events
"The Constitution in 2020: The Future of Criminal Justice"
Marc Rotenberg,
EPIC Executive Director
Florida State University
College of Law
Tallahassee, FL
October 7-8, 2010
____________________
Privacy '10 Campaign Launch
Mott House
Washington, D.C.
October 13, 2010
Event Announcementform
RSVP Here
____________________
The Public Voice Civil Society Meeting: "Next Generation Privacy Challenges and Opportunities"
The Public Voice
Jerusalem
October 25, 2010
____________________
"Broadband Networks and Smart Grid at the crossroad between ICT Energy"
Lillie Coney,
EPIC Associate Executive Director
Columbia Business School
New York, NY
December 3, 2010
More EPIC Events...
EPIC in the News
One agency wants Internet wiretaps, another wants privacy protectedNextGovOctober 6, 2010
____________________
Critics Strike At Google's New 'All-It-Can-Eat' Privacy PolicyMediaPost NewsOctober 5, 2010
More EPIC in the News...
EPIC Docket Highlights
EPIC Cases
EPIC v. DHS (Emergency Stay, Body Scanners)
EPIC FTC Complaint (Google)
EPIC FTC Complaint (Phone Records)
EPIC v. DHS (FOIA, Body Scanners)
EPIC v. DOD (TIA/Fee Waiver)
EPIC v. DOJ (FOIA, Body Scanners)
EPIC v. DOJ (IOB reports)
EPIC v. DOJ (NSA Surveillance)
EPIC v. FTC (Conflict of Interest)
EPIC v. NSA (Cybersecurity)
EPIC v. VSP (Fusion Centers)
Gonzales v. ACLU (NSLs)
Google Books Settlement
In re Facebook (Settings)
In re Facebook II (Settings) In re Google (Buzz)
In re Google (Cloud Computing)
NASA v. Nelson (Employee Privacy)
EPIC Amicus Briefs:
Recent EPIC Briefs
City of Ontario v. Quon (Txt Messages)
Commonwealth v. Connolly (GPS Tracking)
Doe v. Reed (Petition Signatures)
G.D. v. Kenny (Expungement)
Harris v. Blockbuster (Facebook Privacy)
IMS Health v. Sorrell (Medical Privacy)
Ostergren v. McDonnell (Identity Theft)
SEC v. Galleon (Wiretapping)
Other EPIC Briefs
ACLU v. DOD (Secrecy)
BATF v. Chicago (FOIA)
Bunnell v. MPAA (Wiretap)
Crawford v. Marion County (Voter ID)
Doe v. Chao (Privacy Act)
Flores-Figueroa v. US (ID Theft)
Gilmore v. Ashcroft (Secrecy)
Gonzales v. Doe (Wiretap)
Hepting v. AT amp;T (Wiretap)
Herring v. US (Errors in databases)
Hiibel v. Nevada (Anonymity)
IMS Health v. Ayotte (Medical privacy)
Kehoe v. Fidelity Bank (Consumer privacy)
Kohler v. Englade (DNA)
NCTA v. FCC (Phone records privacy)
New Jersey v. Reid (ISP subscriber privacy)
Peterson v. NTIA (WHOIS data)
Reno v. Condon (DPPA)
Smith v. Doe (Megans Law)
US v. Councilman (Wiretap)
Watchtower Bible v. Stratton (Anonymity)
Complete EPIC Docket
Electronic Privacy Information Center | 1718 Connecticut Ave. NW Washington, DC 20009 | More info