INSERT INTO sites(host) VALUES('') 1045: Access denied for user 'www-data'@'localhost' (using password: NO) Estimated Worth $43,788 - MYIP.NET Website Information
Welcome to!
 Set MYIP as homepage      


Web Page Information

Meta Description:
Meta Keywords:
sponsored links:
sponsored links:

Traffic and Estimation


Website Ranks

Alexa Rank:
Google Page Rank:
Sogou Rank:
Baidu Cache:

Search Engine Indexed

Search EngineIndexedLinks

Server Data

Web Server:
IP address:    

Registry information

ICANN Registrar:
Name Server:
Whois Server:

Alexa Rank and trends

Traffic: Today One Week Avg. Three Mon. Avg.
Unique IP:

More ranks in the world

Users from these countries/regions

Where people go on this site

Alexa Charts

Alexa Reach and Rank

Whois data

Who is at


Registry Domain ID: D98279773-LROR

Registrar WHOIS Server:

Registrar URL:

Updated Date: 2017-06-15T18:49:57Z

Creation Date: 2003-06-23T00:28:58Z

Registry Expiry Date: 2018-06-23T00:28:58Z

Registrar Registration Expiration Date:

Registrar: Wild West Domains, LLC

Registrar IANA ID: 440

Registrar Abuse Contact Email:

Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:


Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited

Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited

Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited

Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited

Registry Registrant ID: C151806926-LROR

Registrant Name: Christine Baker

Registrant Organization: none

Registrant Street: 3880 Stockton Hill Rd.

Registrant City: Kingman

Registrant State/Province: Arizona

Registrant Postal Code: 86409

Registrant Country: US

Registrant Phone: +1.9282249663

Registrant Phone Ext:

Registrant Fax: +1.9282249663

Registrant Fax Ext:

Registrant Email: christine

Registry Admin ID: C151806927-LROR

Admin Name: Christine Baker

Admin Organization: none

Admin Street: 3880 Stockton Hill Rd.

Admin City: Kingman

Admin State/Province: Arizona

Admin Postal Code: 86409

Admin Country: US

Admin Phone: +1.2062024653

Admin Phone Ext:

Admin Fax:

Admin Fax Ext:

Admin Email: christine

Registry Tech ID: C151806929-LROR

Tech Name: Christine Baker

Tech Organization: none

Tech Street: 3880 Stockton Hill Rd.

Tech City: Kingman

Tech State/Province: Arizona

Tech Postal Code: 86409

Tech Country: US

Tech Phone: +1.2062024653

Tech Phone Ext:

Tech Fax:

Tech Fax Ext:

Tech Email: christine

Name Server:

Name Server:

Name Server:

DNSSEC: unsigned

URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form:

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2017-10-07T09:21:47Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit

Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest

Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances

will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b)

enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Pub

lic Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

Front Page Thumbnail

sponsored links:

Front Page Loading Time

Keyword Hits (Biger,better)

Other TLDs of creditsuit

TLDs Created Expires Registered

Similar Websites


Search Engine Spider Emulation

Title:Fighting credit bureaus, creditors and debt buyers | 2015 Credit Suit
Description:Fighting credit bureaus, creditors and debt buyers
Fighting credit bureaus, creditors and debt buyers | 2015 Credit Suit
2015 Credit SuitFighting credit bureaus, creditors and debt buyers
HomeLitigation Forum
FCC advises PayPal that its new policy violates the TCPAPosted on June 12, 2015 by christine bull; 0 CommentsThe FCC #8217;s 6/11/15 certified letter to PayPal makes it clear that PayPal #8217;s plan to exempt itself from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act violates the law.聽聽 This is rather timely as I #8217;m getting ready to sue a collector who called my cell phone repeatedly for another person #8217;s debt and I certainly did not consent to calls to my cell.
Here #8217;s the letter: Continue Reading
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: TCPA
Arizona statute of limitations #8212; are checking accounts #8220;open accounts #8221; ?Posted on February 5, 2015 by christine bull; 0 CommentsMy last post was about overdraft credit lines.聽聽 But what about checking accounts?
I would think so since banks often PAY checks even with insufficient funds and therefore they extend credit (since they expect to get paid back.)
Is there any case law?
I would argue that the 3 year statute of limitations applies.
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: General
Overdraft credit lines are NOT credit cards and the 3 year SOL applies in ArizonaPosted on January 24, 2015 by christine bull; 0 CommentsA reader asked about the statute of limitations for an overdraft credit line tied to a checking account.
From my Midland Funding cross-motion for summary judgment in Arizona justice court regarding a CREDIT CARD, posted at the Litigation Forum:
Midland #8216;s Claim Is Time Barred.
The Arizona legislature changed the statute of limitations for credit cards from 3 to 6 years in 2011. The new law became effective on 7/20/11. [DSOF 4] Therefore, the 3-year statute of limitations applies to the alleged debt as it was not subject to a written agreement [DSOF 5] and all my credit card accounts were 鈥渙pen鈥 accounts:
ARS 12-543 Oral debt; stated or open account; relief on ground of fraud or mistake; three year limitation
There shall be commenced and prosecuted within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions:
For debt where the indebtedness is not evidenced by a contract in writing.
Upon stated or open accounts other than such mutual and current accounts as concern the trade of merchandise between merchant and merchant, their factors or agents, but no item of a stated or open account shall be barred so long as any item thereof has been incurred within three years immediately prior to the bringing of an action thereon. [emphasis added]
I have not used any credit card that I later defaulted on after June 2008 [Affidavit 露2, DSOF 6]. Midland filed the complaint on June 11, 2012. [DSOF 7]
Pursuant to ARS 12-505, an action barred by pre-existing law is not revived by amendment of the law:
ARS 12-505. Effect of statute changing limitation
An action barred by pre-existing law is not revived by amendment of such law enlarging the time in which such action may be commenced.
This action is time barred:
Midland failed to produce a written contract and it can not produce a written agreement as I did not have written contracts with any of my credit card issuers. [Affidavit 露3, DSOF 5]
Midland can not possible document charges less than 3 years prior to 7/20/11, the effective date of the new 6 year statute of limitations [Affidavit 露2, DSOF 6]
Time barred actions are not revived by amendment of the law.
Midland filed suit on 6/11/12, when the action was already time barred.
Attached hereto is DSS Financial v. Deborah Walrod as Exhibit A.聽聽 On 1/15/09 The Maricopa County Superior Court concluded on appeal that the action for a First USA credit card was time barred as the last charge occurred over 3 years prior to the filing of the lawsuit.
In LVNV Funding v Leslie Thompson, Exhibit B, the Maricopa County Superior Court ruled on 2/15/08 that a claim for a Sears charge card was time barred because the last charge occurred over 3 years prior to the filing of the lawsuit.
Even if Midland could provide admissible evidence to document its claim, this action would be time barred.
The court dismissed Midland #8217;s claim because the SOL had expired.
In the reader #8217;s case, I would argue that the 3-year statute of limitations for open accounts applies, provided that the debt buyer failed to provide a written contract. A credit line is not a credit card as defined by ARS A.R.S. 搂 13-2101,
12-543. Oral debt; stated or open account; relief on ground of fraud or mistake; three year limitation
Hope that helps!
PS: I would also always challenge the authenticity of debt buyer documentation such as bills of sale, account docs, etc. as I prevailed against debt buyer Acarta because they could not establish standing (the AZ court of appeals remanded after superior court had granted the Acarta motion for summary judgment.)
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: General
Midland Funding interest fraud documentedPosted on December 10, 2014 by christine bull; 0 CommentsI #8217;ve been working on my responses to the Midland and Equifax motions for summary judgment.聽 One of my FCRA claims revolves around the Midland verifications of incorrect balances with Equifax.
Midland had sued me in justice court and I realized that Midland charged interest from the date of chargeoff #8212; NOT from the date it purchased the account.聽 In justice court, Midland decided to not seek any interest in its motion for summary judgment to avoid further investigation of its practice to charge illegal interest.
When I sued Midland after its lawsuit was dismissed (expired SOL), Midland provided NO documents at all in response to my discovery requests.聽 After several failed attempts to get them to cooperate with filing a joint discovery motion, they finally provided me with documents on the evening before the doomed settlement conference.
From the 8/18/2014 MCM Supplemental Responses to my Request for Production of Documents, Document # 4, Account #1:
Purch. from HSBC BANK NEVADA, N. A. on 1/26/10, purch. bal. = $2,260.41
Charge-Off Date: 12/31/2008
Charge-Off Balance:聽 2,260.41
Interest Method:聽 Interest accrued from charge-off date
As per Arizona state law creditors can charge 10% interest.聽聽 Obviously, a creditor can NOT charge interest PRIOR to its purchase of an account.聽 And that #8217;s exactly what Midland is doing.
Midland charged 10% interest for over two years #8211; while it did NOT own the account!聽
HSBC was one of the credit card issuers who did not charge interest after an account was charged off (unlike Capital One, which purchased the HSBC credit card portfolio).
In 2003 I sued Capital One and the credit bureaus because they refused to report the Cap One credit limits and this practice could significantly lower FICO scores.聽聽 Due to my relentless publication and litigation, several class actions were filed and finally all credit bureaus reported the Cap One credit limits around 2007.聽 I sure hope it won #8217;t take several years for Midland to be sued into oblivion!
ALL Midland judgments that include these fraudulent interest charges should be vacated and all collection accounts should be cancelled.聽
And of course all consumers who PAID these fraudulent interest charges deserve compensation.
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: Midland fraudulent interest charges
Motion to join Trans Union denied and Equifax and Midland filed motions for summary judgmentPosted on November 19, 2014 by christine bull; 0 CommentsIt took me over 2 hours to download, print and file the 10/31/14 Equifax and Midland Funding motions for summary judgment and my responses are due in a couple of weeks on December 3.
It is very odd that judge Logan denied my motion to amend my complaint and to join TU so that defendants wouldn #8217;t be prejudiced because the defendants did NOT object to the joinder of TU.聽 He also did NOT extend the discovery deadlines as we had requested.聽聽 So now nobody got done with discovery and Equifax hasn #8217;t even submitted its initial disclosures.聽 If its motion for summary judgment is denied, we go to trial without any discovery whatsoever.聽 Very strange!
And I #8217;ll have to file a new lawsuit against Midland and TU for the FCRA and FDCPA violations due to the false verifications of the Midland accounts by TU in 6/14.聽 Of course first thing #8217;s first, need to respond to the motions for summary judgment.聽聽 I #8217;d love to buy the NCLC FCRA book for $250, but I just paid auto insurance and my annual web hosting is due soon, so I #8217;ll greatly appreciate any donations through GoFundMe (almost 10% in fees) or directly via Amazon Payments, Dwolla or by check.
I was hoping to upload all major filings, but with my extremely slow internet connection (1 mb download max on a good day and of course much slower uploads), I don #8217;t know when I get to that.聽 Rumor has it that we #8217;ll get high speed wireless within a few months or even weeks and I #8217;m delaying major web work until then.
I will however post the Equifax documentation with the Midland verifications and the Midland account info clearly showing that they charge entirely FRAUDULENT interest from the time the accounts were charged off to when they purchased the accounts #8212; charging interest while they did NOT own the accounts!
Midland #8217;s practice to charge interest for the time prior to its purchase apparently affects all collection accounts owned by Midland and I estimate that Midland (Encore Capital Group ECPG) collected and continues to attempt to collect MILLIONS of dollars in entirely fraudulent interest charges.
This fraud needs to stop!
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: Baker v. Midland / Bursey amp; Associates, Equifax
Doomed settlement conference failed, joinder of Trans Union next, GoFundMePosted on September 9, 2014 by christine bull; 0 CommentsI #8217;ve been receiving emails inquiring whether I was ok and requesting status updates.聽 I #8217;m sorry for the silence here, I #8217;ve been so incredibly busy and am finally making time.
Initially the settlement conference was scheduled for 7/7/14 and after countless emails and motions, it was rescheduled to 8/19/14.
The 8/19/14 settlement conference
I can #8217;t discuss what happened at the conference, other than that it failed.
I wanted to reschedule the settlement conference again because I hadn #8217;t received the Equifax initial disclosures and the Midland discovery responses, but attorneys William Fife for Midland and Ann Broussard for Equifax opposed another continuance.
While the Midland defendants #8217; discovery responses were due on 7/7/14, they didn #8217;t provide a single meaningful response or document until the evening prior to the 8/19/14 settlement conference.聽 I downloaded hundreds of pages around 10 pm and obviously couldn #8217;t review most docs.
However, it is clear from the Midland docs that they report an incorrect DLA for one account to Equifax and that they charge interest from the date of charge-off instead of the date when they purchased the accounts.聽 I will be posting a lot more info about the credit reporting and interest calculations in a separate post.
As expected, the settlement conference resulted in me wasting several hundred dollars on travel, two days on the road and having to drive through countless storms on flooded roads.聽 Not to mention the huge amount of time wasted preparing for the conference.
Incredibly, I was the only person prepared for the conference.聽 While the attorneys attending the conference had claimed that they were fully informed about the case, they didn #8217;t even have the Midland documents proving that it reported incorrect data as I received those discovery responses from their California attorneys the night before the hearing.
Of course I will NEVER AGAIN agree to attend a settlement conference.
The defendants were allowed to attend by telephone and the entire purpose of the settlement conference was to waste my very limited resources or even better, cause me to dismiss my claims because I can #8217;t afford to waste what little time and money I have on a doomed settlement conference.聽 So if you don #8217;t live close to the courthouse, act accordingly. You don #8217;t HAVE to agree to attend a settlement conference.
Apparently the Midland attorneys had NO idea that Midland #8217;s own records show that they report incorrect information to the credit bureaus.
First attorney David Campbell and then his successor attorney William Fife filed all these motions without having any information about the accounts!
Despite clear evidence from Midland #8217;s own records, they still have not notified me that they are correcting their credit reporting.
On 6/23/14 Midland verified the incorrect data with Trans Union and I #8217;m currently working on my 2nd amended complaint to join Trans Union.
I will definitely try to update regularly and I #8217;ve been meaning to post my email communications with the attorneys.
This litigation is not just about correcting my credit reports and getting paid for my damages, but I #8217;d like to do whatever it takes to not have to sue for false credit reporting again.聽 After all, I #8217;ve been in court for 12 or 13 years now and I #8217;m continually experiencing NEW issues.聽聽 I #8217;m sick and tired of corrupt courts!
As this case documents, scummy debt buyers won #8217;t even correct their credit reporting when sued and their own docs show that they report false data.
The system needs to be changed and consumers need to be able to hold credit bureaus, creditors and debt buyers accountable WITHOUT having to spend a fortune on litigation.
Corporations ignore consumer protection laws with impunity.聽 The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau needs to step up its enforcement actions and as my litigation documents, we need a CONSUMER COURT with judges well trained in consumer law and ensuring that FAIR and SPEEDY proceedings will result in JUSTICE.
Of course it #8217;ll require LOTS of work to bring these issues to the attention of legislators and regulators and I #8217;m not superwoman.
I currently have two main #8220;hobbies #8221;:
Sharing my litigation experiences and working to increase the enforcement of consumer protection laws.
Learning and teaching how to grow nutrient dense organic food in the desert and fighting genetically modified food.
My day could have a hundred hours and I still wouldn #8217;t get everything done.聽聽 So I decided to let YOU tell me how important it is to make it easier for consumers to find justice in courts, or even better, without going to court, and to enhance consumer protection laws such as the FDCPA.
I finally created my GoFundMe page and I plan on some major updates for this website.
It #8217;s up to YOU to make it happen.
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: Baker v. Midland / Bursey amp; Associates
Remove the lying lawyers #8217; tongues?Posted on July 19, 2014 by christine bull; 0 CommentsFrom a post in a soil health group:
I think we should have worldwide mass tongue removals of pathological liars.
Leave them their lives, don #8217;t even remove them from office or function. Just remove their tongue.
The archetype #8220;The Devil #8221; or #8220;Baal #8221; is called the Lord of Lies for a reason. All power of intimidation comes from Lying. Weapons are only secondary, The Lie is primary.
Although there are other forms or tools used for Lying, truly the most effective way of lying (and causing the greatest psychological damage) is speech. Remove that power, and it is like clipping wings.
Also most of the power of a Lie comes from its quick, ad hoc, response (or failing that, its dragged out empty circular rhetoric). It catches people unawares and off guard.
The written word does not nearly have so much power. This is due to the time-delay because of the reading and the processing of the words in our brains. It is a personal process, and will allow our own thoughts greater control over what is being assimilated.
So the removal of tongues from the Liars will greatly help others see through the bullshit.
There #8217;s a thought.聽 But I think the keyboard also needs to be taken away.聽
It is true that the written word does not have that much power because you have time to consider a response, if it #8217;s possible to respond.
And that #8217;s the reason why I never want to argue with lawyers in court #8212; where I don #8217;t have any time at all to think about how to prove that they #8217;re lying. And often there are so many lies, you just don #8217;t have time to address them all.
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: General
Midland Funding demands protective order prior to providing ANY docsPosted on July 15, 2014 by christine bull; 2 CommentsMidland and MCM didn #8217;t provide a single document in response to my discovery requests.聽 Last week I asked that they provide me with their portion for a joint motion regarding this discovery dispute.聽 Instead, they sent me this bizarre protective order:
7-11-14 #8211;Proposed-Stipulated-Protective-Order.pdf
7-11-14 #8211;Proposed-Protective-Order-Exhibit A.pdf
I emailed to her yesterday:
The Proposed Protective Order states:
#8220; #8230;. in order to facilitate the exchange of information and documents which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, and privacy rights, the Parties stipulate to the following Stipulated Protective Order: #8221;
I am perfectly capable of protecting my private data such as my social security number and other personal information and if I wish to publish it, that #8217;s my right.聽 I trust that you will comply with state and federal laws and that you and your clients will refrain from publishing my personal data without a protective order.聽 Since I did not ask for any personal and private data from your clients, the Order is simply not necessary.
As you already know, this case will be used to document that consumer laws such as the FDCPA and the FCRA need significant enhancements and I am preparing a website for regulators, legislators and consumer activists so they can see for themselves what happens when a consumer who can #8217;t afford to pay an attorney sues a debt buyer like Midland for correct credit reporting.
And lastly, the Proposed Protective Order is completely unclear on the procedures.聽 Am I supposed to fly around the country to #8220;inspect #8221; documents?
Please immediately provide ALL documents requested and if you feel that any document contains your clients #8217; #8220;private #8221; data, identify each document and state exactly which information you consider private.
Christine Baker
Attorney Gabriel #8217;s response today:
Dear Ms. Baker:
Please clarify your statements below and explain precisely which terms in the draft Stipulated Protective Order are unclear to you.
With respect to your bolded request below, we are not required to list in advance which documents we consider confidential.聽 This is the purpose for the Protective Order.聽 As previously explained, we will supplement discovery responses and exchange documents with you once a Protective Order is in place.
If you do not want to agree to a Stipulated Protective Order, please let us know and we will proceed with our Motion for Protective Order.
Thank you,
Tamar Gabriel, Esq.
Carlson amp; Messer LLP
My reply:
Ms. Gabriel,
Did I not write in English?
What is it you don #8217;t understand?
Do you EVER actually answer a question?
Christine Baker
The only thing that keeps me going is knowing that the more obnoxious they are, the more likely it is that legislators will significantly enhance the FDCPA and FCRA.
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: Baker v. Midland / Bursey amp; Associates
Midland and Equifax settlement conference rescheduledPosted on July 11, 2014 by christine bull; 0 CommentsIt was a nightmare last week leading up to the settlement conference scheduled for 7/7.
I would have NEVER agreed to a settlement conference had I known that the defendants would appear by telephone, see my post Settlement discussions with Midland Funding and MCM.
I had been out all day when I got the judge #8217;s order granting Midland #8217;s motion to appear telephonically despite my opposition and I ended up working on my motion to reschedule the hearing to August till 3:30 AM.聽 In the alternative, I requested permission to appear telephonically. 聽 Why the hell should *** I *** have to incur the costs and waste MY time to have to travel to Phoenix?聽 After all, I filed the lawsuit in Kingman and Midland had it removed to federal court.
Out of nowhere, Equifax had also filed a motion to appear telephonically. Apparently it was just served by the US Marshals Services on 6/26.
Fortunately, the hearing was rescheduled to 8/19 on the Wednesday before the 4th of July, but I have to drive to Phoenix to attend.聽 Then Equifax wanted to move the hearing to 8/18 due to their attorney #8217;s travel schedule. 聽 I offered to go on the 18th which requires an extra day car rental if Equifax pays for my extra costs, but they advised that they would not reimburse my additional expenses.聽 So it #8217;s 8/19 and both Equifax and Midland will appear by phone.聽 Considering how sick and tired I am of those lying lawyers, settlement is extremely unlikely.
I have to say that it is extraordinary how the lawyers are deliberately offending me, lying to me and being at their absolute worst.聽 Obviously, they get paid much more if we don #8217;t settle and they managed to piss me off tremendously in those weeks leading up to the settlement conference.聽 Great job!
There is the option to cancel the conference if we feel that it will not be productive and I #8217;ll probably do that.
My next post will be about Midland #8217;s refusal to provide ANY documents requested through discovery unless I sign a confidentiality order.
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: Baker v. Midland / Bursey amp; Associates, Equifax
Basic income #8211; GrundeinkommenPosted on July 6, 2014 by christine bull; 0 CommentsAn excellent article on #8220;basic income #8221;, also discussed in Germany as #8220;Grundeinkommen #8221;:
We know it works great in Alaska and of course the #8220;world #8217;s greatest countries #8221; such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, etc.聽 They actually give some of the money from natural resources to their citizens.
In the US (except for Alaska), our assets including OUR resources such as oil and minerals are being funneled to the CORPORATIONS.
In case you #8217;re wondering why I #8217;m posting on this subject at a website about credit litigation #8230;
If we had a basic income of $1,000/month, MANY people could take time to fight predatory lending practices, lying lawyers and court rules and policies designed to make it IMPOSSIBLE for a consumer to actually #8220;win. #8221;聽 Having worked with home buyers and clients who needed to improve their credit rating for almost 25 years, I know that most people just don #8217;t have the TIME to fight abusive creditors, debt buyers and their henchmen.
Back in the 70s I was sure that the 20-hour week was only 20 years away.聽 But something happened just around the time Reagan was elected and instead of working fewer hours, we worked MORE hours to be able to survive.
And it doesn #8217;t matter who was president since, the working people got to work harder and longer with few benefits while the rich got richer.
Obama threw us a bone with Obama Care.聽 For me it #8217;s a blessing because I actually got free health insurance now.聽 Midland Funding #8217;s henchmen argue that I don #8217;t have any damages for emotional distress because I couldn #8217;t afford to see a doctor.
Debt buyers claim that unless you are rich, you cannot be damaged!
I made the decision to drop out of this corrupt system many years ago and I moved to the desert in 2001.聽 I have friends and clients who support me and I was able to put up a fight.聽聽 If we had a basic income, I would have been able to publicize my litigation against Capital One (they sued me 3 times and finally gave up) and debt buyers Acarta and Midland and I would have had the time to contact regulators and legislators. MANY people could afford to FIGHT BACK against these vultures if they weren #8217;t struggling to get by.
I doubt we #8217;ll see basic income any time soon as the corporations know exactly how far they can push the people and they make sure that most people will have a place to live and food on the table #8212; crappy GMO food that makes people sick and that of course results in even greater profits for the pharmaceuticals.
Most people are so busy working and watching TV, they don #8217;t have the slightest clue what #8217;s going on. For a lot more info basic income and many reference links please read:
Why Should We Support the Idea of an Unconditional Basic Income?
EmailPinterestGoogleFacebookTwitterMoreRedditLinkedInPocketTumblrPrintFiled Under: General
larr; Older posts
Subscribe for Updates
Email Address
Search this site
Recent Posts
FCC advises PayPal that its new policy violates the TCPA
Arizona statute of limitations #8212; are checking accounts #8220;open accounts #8221; ?
Overdraft credit lines are NOT credit cards and the 3 year SOL applies in Arizona
Midland Funding interest fraud documented
Motion to join Trans Union denied and Equifax and Midland filed motions for summary judgment
Baker v. Acarta
Baker v. Midland / Bursey amp; Associates
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
Credit scoring #8211; FICO
Debt buyer news
JP Morgan Chase
Midland fraudulent interest charges
Go To TopAdministration LoginCopyright copy; 2015 2015 Credit SuitView Full Site
Send to Email Address
Your Name
Your Email Address
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.

Updated Time

Friend links: ProxyFire    More...
Site Map 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750
TOS | Contact us
© 2009 Dev by MYIP Elapsed:45.008ms