The Atlantic Review recommends and summarizes commentaries, analyses and news reports on the United States and transatlantic issues, especially German-American relations. As Fulbright Alumni from Germany we strive for a critical, but fair coverage. Keywords:
Germany, Merkel, Iran, Steinmeier, Trans-Atlantic, USA, United States, international politics, foreign policy, Iraq, NATO, United Nations, European Union, U.S.-German, deutsch-amerikanische Beziehungen, German-American relationship, blog, newsletter, press digest, Anti-Americanism, Vereinigte Staaten, Senator Fulbright, Aussenpolitik Body:
Skip to content
Transatlantic Drift or a Renaissance of the West?
HomeAbout Transatlantic RelationsNATOGermanyFulbrightUS Foreign PolicyEconomics
Berlin is not Afraid
Posted by Editors on Tuesday, December 20. 2016
Terroristen dieser Welt, schaut auf diese Stadt!
Our 9/11 reflexes are alive and well, but is the tragedy of Berlin really a national crisis?
Running a lorry into a crowded Christmas market was an attack on our lifestyle and insofar it transcends Berlin. But the magnitude of the tragedy warrants individual solidarity, not a national uproar. Our thoughts should be with the families of those we have lost. Yet this is not a moment to rally around the flag - because when disaster does strike, these "9/11 reflexes" will be worn out from the almost daily routine of mourning the dead of terrorist attacks in cities around the world.
Continue reading "Berlin is not Afraid"
DISQUS, 0 Trackbacks
Thought Experiment: NATO Distorts American Strategic Interest
Posted by Editors on Sunday, November 27. 2016
In Aesop聮s fable the Lion, the Bear and the Fox, the lion and the bear fight over a deer until both are too tired to continue, the fox, having seen their fatigue and lacerations runs off with the deer in its jaws. America, being the Lion, is reengaging in its global power struggle through NATO with Russia, the Bear. The deer in this scenario is a strategic interest or something akin to a superpower status. For the sake of argument, the Fox can be China. America too busy with Russia means it cannot pay attention to a greater threat of China who economically and demographically is far more likely to supersede it than Russia 聳 which is both geopolitically vulnerable and demographically weak. In this sense NATO drags America to engage against Russia over Ukraine and it complicates a possible convergence of interests with Russia in combatting radical Islamic terrorism. In sum there are few direct strategic interests in combatting Russia.
Continue reading "Thought Experiment: NATO Distorts American Strategic Interest"
Categories: European Issues, US Foreign Policy | DISQUS, 0 Trackbacks Defined tags for this entry: china, nato, russia, strategy
Good luck, Mr. President
Posted by Christian E. Rieck on Friday, November 11. 2016
Despite all the anger and frustration, the Trump victory is not the end of the world. Every American president is part of an institutional structure, his power checked and balanced by other branches of government and institutions of the state. This should lead to some degree of moderation.
Yes, nationalist populism is dangerous in that it corrodes political culture and, ultimately, this institutional structure as well. It also threatens the liberal order both within and between states, as evidenced by this polarizing and often disgraceful presidential election campaign. Not only in this sense a more optimistic political project such as Clinton's would have been preferable, something this ECONOMIST essay also argued for. At least the popular vote indicates that such pragmatic and rational incrementalism still has majority support in America.
Trump promises to give the losers of globalization a voice and democratic representation - a good thing if it can lead to a reform of transnational capitalism and the political institutions that manage it at home. I fear, however, that it will only lead to more polarization, more radicalism, and more dysfunction. The candidate's campaign promised change, hate and fear. But it is the new president's duty to bring about renewal without disruption and breakdown. A tall order under the best of circumstances. Good luck, Mr. President.
DISQUS, 0 Trackbacks
Western Foreign Policy Dissent and NATO's Role in the World
Posted by Editors on Monday, October 3. 2016
Jeremy Corbyn recently won his re-election to lead Britain聮s opposition party, the Labour Party. An ardent socialist and sceptic of interventionism, he has advocated leaving NATO before being leader. Now as leader, he has consistently criticised it for destabilising eastern Europe due to its Eastward expansion in the 1990s, antagonising Russia and being involved outside NATO聮s traditional sphere, for example in Afghanistan. Corbyn has publically argued at Labour Party, Stop the War Coalition and Momentum rallies (extra-parliamentary organisations closely allied to Corbyn) that NATO should be 聭closed down聮 to bring a halt to potential war in Eastern Europe. With his position secure in Parliament, his argument, and the movements that agree will not disappear.
Corbyn聮s foreign policy argument is that NATO is a hegemonic instrument for the West, particularly America and oil companies. Recent history has shown that the United States has declared war on more states, like Iraq and Panama and non-state actors like Al-Qaeda or Somali rebels than Russia has. NATO has been used in interventions, like Libya, that in Corbyn聮s eyes bring together NATO聮s imperialism and oil security. Further evidence cited by Corbyn is that NATO is by far the strongest military alliance in the world聳 with a combined budget of $900 billion, with the United States contributing two thirds; it dwarfs Russia聮s $50 billion. This hard military power can only ever be malign, military force that size cannot be benign according to Corbyn.
Continue reading "Western Foreign Policy Dissent and NATO's Role in the World"
Categories: European Issues, Transatlantic Relations, US Foreign Policy | DISQUS, 0 Trackbacks Defined tags for this entry: China, Elections, NATO, Russia, Solidarity, Strategy
Colombians Reject Peace Deal. Now Back to War?
Posted by Christian E. Rieck on Monday, October 3. 2016
Colombians have just rejected a historic peace agreement with the FARC. 65.000 votes out of 13 million ballots made the difference. A geographic breakdown of the results will show that acceptance was highest in those areas that have suffered the most from the war, while refusal was mostly an urban middle class phenomenon.
Continue reading "Colombians Reject Peace Deal. Now Back to War?"
DISQUS, 0 Trackbacks
Remember the Wall, Forget quot;Bridge of Spies quot;
Posted by Christian E. Rieck on Sunday, August 14. 2016
BRIDGE OF SPIES simply gets 1950s East Berlin wrong. It was not as desolate and ruined as depicted here. Unter den Linden in the historic city center had been quickly reconstructed, opera houses and state university included. A shiny new city center around Alexanderplatz and the new Stalinallee had also been created by 1957/1961 (the time BRIDGE is set in). For many, East Berlin was indeed a fragile, but hopeful place.
Continue reading "Remember the Wall, Forget quot;Bridge of Spies quot;"
Categories: German Politics | DISQUS, 0 Trackbacks Defined tags for this entry: Germany, History
The Age of Fear Continues
Posted by Christian E. Rieck on Tuesday, June 14. 2016
David Rothkopf is worried that the "Age of Fear" is not over yet. The Bush and Obama presidencies both made the international war on terror a central tenet of US foreign policy. It became the central national issue. Rothkopf had hoped that the 2016 election would mark a return to a broader foreign policy agenda, one that focused more on the larger trends going on in the world (from rising powers to the challenges of global governance).
Continue reading "The Age of Fear Continues"
Categories: US Domestic and Cultural Issues, US Foreign Policy | DISQUS, 0 Trackbacks Defined tags for this entry: Election, Elections, Fear, Strategy, Terrorism
Clinton gives Atlanticist speech at the Pacific
Posted by Joerg Wolf on Saturday, March 26. 2016
Hillary Clinton is much more supportive of NATO and Europe than all the other presidential candidates. Yesterday, Hillary Clinton gave an impressive speech describing NATO as "one of the best investments America has ever made". She stressed the need for US leadership and collaboration with allies in the struggle against ISIS. Bernie Sanders has yet to give a major speech on NATO. Donald Trump's opinion on NATO reflects widely held sentiments in the US.
Hillary Clinton's speech was impressive because she spoke at Stanford on the Pacific coast, and not on the Atlantic. She spoke to students, not the old Cold War generation with a stronger attachment to Europe. Often accused of pandering to the desires and needs of her given audience, Hillary Clinton here did not talk about opportunities in Asia-Pacific region, but about the threats in Europe and the Middle East and the need for strong US engagement in these regions. Moreover, the speech comes shortly after recent statements by Donald Trump and President Obama who criticized Europeans as mainly free-riders on defense in interviews with Washington Post and The Atlantic respectively.
Continue reading "Clinton gives Atlanticist speech at the Pacific"
Categories: Transatlantic Relations | DISQUS, 0 Trackbacks Defined tags for this entry: alliance, clinton, elections, nato, solidarity, terrorism
Page 1 of 165, totaling 1313 entries
next page rarr;
Tweets von @transatlantic
J枚rg Wolf and Christian Rieck appreciate feedback, suggestions and media enquiries. About us
You can also follow and contact Atlantic Review via social media. We post additional updates on both Twitter and Facebook:
Google the Site
Fulbright Alumni e.V.
European Issues (103)
German Politics (229)
In-House News (18)
International Economics (164)
Transatlantic Relations (720)
US Domestic and Cultural Issues (160)
US Foreign Policy (259)
Powered by Serendipity amp; the 2k11 theme.